Akkam’s Razor

• Emptywheel » The Rhetoric of More of the Same
  [W]e want to retain an exception to such regulation for the wilder and more complex financial products. So rather than admit that such a system is no longer sustainable, we will institutionalize a general ‘re-set’ button for the entire financial system.”
  (tags: us treasury finance regulations)
• Job Search Made Simple | SimplyHired
  Use our nifty tools to find local jobs, identify trends, research salaries, and secure that offer letter.
  (tags: jobs jobsearch career employment job search web2.0)

• The Google Super Tuesday Map Mashup
  (tags: mashup google twitter politics US election supertuesday)
• Are You Ready for Location-Based Advertising?
  (tags: ads google GPS location mobile phone)
• Choose Your Own Conspiracy: Undersea Cable Edition
  A variety of theories…
  (tags: undersea cable interruption sabotage middleeast conincidence conspiracy)
• Inky Notes: Inquirer Financial Crisis Looms Threatening 10% Layoffs and more
  A summation of a trackrecord of NOT being on the correct side of many, MANY debates…
  (tags: philadelphia Inquirer briantierney accountability readership newspapers revenues)
• What Americans Should But Don’t Know About Religion
  (tags: pew research religion america culture US)

As soon as I had heard that a second fiber-optic undersea internet cable (map and story here and here - the number of broken cables now stands at four) had been broken in the Middle East, I automatically thought of the United States, the Bush Administrations desire to hit Iran, and the USS Jimmy Carter.

In the US Navy, tradition is that Presidents names are placed on aircraft carriers. But things would be different for Jimmy Carter, a former Nuclear Submariner. The Seawolf class submarine that would eventually bare his name would also be different than her class-mates.

I got a heads up from Jarice Hanson (participant bio page), a chairperson at Temple University's (my alma mater, BTW) School of Communication and Theater regarding a webconference at WHYY titled Digital Democracy and Freedom of Speech.

The event looks quite interesting, and it is scheduled at a most-convenient time, 1-2:30pm on Tuesday, 10/9/2007, at the WHYY building, especially for those in the Center City (Philadelphia) area. 

To quickly riff on the subject, I understand and expect this conference to have a very US-centric focus, but I suspect conversations regarding digital freedom, at least as we Americans understand Freedom of Speech as enumerated in the First Ammendment (or don't, as the case may be), will most likely affect other nations, such as those in the Middle East and China, where excessive blocking and monitoring, often aided and abetted by prominent US companies such as Yahoo are the norm.

The excessive use of national security exemptions in FOIA, the circumvention of records-keeping and civil liberty safeguards, and others are all blatant attempts to stymie freedom of the press, but what of freedom of speech?  Despite isolated (although far too many) examples of abuses, such as the recent tasing at a John Kerry speech, "Free Speech Zones" at political gatherings, and arrests and detainings based on what t-shirt one wears, I see little formalized institutional censorship, although we're getting there.

That said, there are tremendous threats to digital freedom here in the US, but they often don't come from the government directly to the individual speaker.  No, they come indirectly, via the corporate sphere, the establishment press, intra-governmental agency suppression , other opinion influencers, ideological bullies, our society-at-large, and our own tendencies to self-censor.  In most cases, all it takes is the threat of a libel suit or a DMCA takedown letter to pull content, either by the creator or their ISP.  As illustrated in the Electronic Frontier Foundation Legal Guide, many of the concerns of online speech have little to do with the government.  You can't really say whatever you want.

Popularity: 41% [?]

As if there's any doubt he wont.

He's not going to support anyone in the primaries, that's for damn sure.  No, he won't bravely support whomever the anointed successor to Junior is, no matter how bad they are (IMHO, Giuliani is the "likely" candidate, with Romney being the "better" candidate).

I don't think Joe cares about anything other than Joe, and Joe's ambitions, for whatever reasoning, seem to be the continuation of this was (in Iraq) and the greater war on America and the Institution of the Police State.  That may seem like hyperbole, but a Civil Rights liberal such as Joe was changed, possibly during the Seven Day War and the ongoing strife in Israel and the greater Middle East, and that change was validated (as correct) with 9/11.

What's even more certain, given his lust for war-without-end, is that he won't be supporting any candidate who seeks to undo what Bush and the Neocons have wrought. 

Popularity: 20% [?]

All emphasis below (bolded) are mine.

• Cabinet Magazine Online - A Timeline of Timelines
  (tags: history timeline visualization time design information culture)
• Milestones in the history of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization
  An illustrated chronology of innovations
  (tags: academic archive cartography chart collection data datamining reference design visualization)
• Gallery of Data Visualization - Timelines
  Via Mefi.
  (tags: design information timeline visualization)
• 301 Useless Facts | Single Grain
  (tags: PFOTD trivia facts)
• WordPress Mobile Plugin | Andy Moore
  (tags: wordpress mobile plugin)

Lyndon Baines Johnson said the following after the Tet Offensive, when Walter Cronkite all but called the war a lost cause:

'If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost Middle America.'' 

So says Lee Iacocca now:

Popularity: 18% [?]