Posts Tagged: Iran


1
Oct 09

Is Twitter the American Media’s new local Diner?

One of the more irritating of our media’s obsessions is the visit to the local diner to ascertain what ‘regular’ Americans are thinking about the issues of the day.  Don’t let the fact that the average cranky, homogeneous, low-information diner visitor scarcely resembles the entirety of America stop you.

The reason I mention this is an observation I’ve made with few data points and no research. 


26
Jun 09

Daily Links for June 26th

All excerpts are quoted from the respective link(s).

  • The Steve Rubel Lifestream – Why Lifestream? To Model Leonardo Da Vinci – I like to think of a lifestreaming as today's digital equivalent of Leonardo Da Vinci's notebooks. (Make no mistake, I am no Da Vinci nor do I think of myself in such a way. It's purely an aspirational metaphor.) Da Vinci recorded notes, drawings, questions and more in his notebooks. Some of these were quite mundane (grocery lists and doodles), others were not. But the body of work was over time, a view of a one individual's mind (in his case a great one).

23
Jun 09

On Twitter, the FTC, and Politics…

A couple of observations, which on the surface are barely related.

First, Twitter has really done nothing for the Iranian people, save giving them a place to speak.  The only other outcome has been dead Iranians.  Twitter alone is making the Iranian government do nothing other than crack down.  Hard.

In other news, the FTC is contemplating investigating blog payola, where some bloggers make compensated messages as advertising without disclosure.  The thought is that the few bloggers who are compensated have a disproportionate impact as opinion influencers.


20
Apr 09

Interesting: Israel, Democrats, NSA Wiretaps, Corruption, Bribes, etc., etc.

This story best represents the intersection of several seemingly disparate threads that intertwine the last American decade. It appears that an NSA wiretap ensnared Democratic Representative Jane Harman of California discussing a quid pro quo arrangement with a “suspected Israeli agent”.


8
Nov 08

Daily Links for November 8th


22
Feb 07

“There is a cloud over the White House. Don’t you think the FBI and the grand jury and the American people are entitled to straight answers?”

The most important story that most people know nothing about is the Scooter Libby perjury trial.  This trial delivers – Freedom of the Press, Undercover Spying, WMD, Iran, Iraq, the cozy and manipulative relationship the Bush White House has with the Press, bloggers…and well, everything, including possibly the kitchen sink.

The grand jury from whom these charges sprung was charged with determining if a crime had been committed by the disclosure of the name of an undercover CIA operative doing WMD research against Iran and Iraq in an attempt to smear her husband, war critic of former Ambassador to Iraq Joe Wilson, in response to an OpEd he wrote asserting that Iraq never made an attempt to acquire "yellowcake uranium" as mentioned by the President in his notorious SOTU address regarding the "16-words".

The subpeona list was literally a who's who of the government and press, and in the end, the machinations and statements of Scooter Libby, and their contrast with "the truth", ended in perjury charges for "Irving".

But the nagging question remains – is Patrick Fitzgerald, Republican US Attorney from Chicago, Roman Catholic, Jesuit Educated, "relentless" prosecutor done?  Not based on this statement, as recapped at Rawstory, from his rebuttal of the defense closing argument:

While rebutting the closing argument by the defense at I. Lewis Libby's trial, special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spoke of a "dark cloud over the White House," due to the alleged obstruction of justice by the former White House aide. At the Washington Post's website, columnist Dan Froomkin points out that for the first time, as many have speculated, the prosecutor wasn't just accusing Libby, he was also referring to "them."

According to Froomkin, Fitzgerald "at long last made it quite clear that the depth of Vice President Cheney's role in the leaking of the identity of a CIA operative is one of the central mysteries that Libby's alleged lies prevented investigators from resolving."

"There is a cloud over the vice president . . . And that cloud remains because this defendant obstructed justice," Fitzgerald said. "There is a cloud over the White House. Don't you think the FBI and the grand jury and the American people are entitled to straight answers?"  More…


21
Aug 06

EOTW, part eleventybillion…

From ThinkProgress:

August 22 is a day “some Shiite sects believe…could correspond to the end of the world.” That’s enough for neoconservatives to conclude Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may have “chosen to launch the apocalypse” tomorrow.


14
Aug 06

Israel vs. Hezballebanon

Seems like the new kohmeni has a blog, and he sucks at it.  Some of the snarkier people on the internet wonder how long it will be till he starts posting pictures of his cat and those annoying little quizes that the LiveJoural folk are so found of…
In other news, looks like 8/22/2006 might be a bad day for all - the WSJ OP-Ed (and neocon cheerleading section) states the 22nd is a big Muslim holiday, replete with fire, brimstone, and prophets.
I hate to criticize Israel militarily, one, having never served myself, and two, I will not immediately suffer the fallout from this little adventure.  My military experience consists of a lot of reading and playing with GIJoe as a child, but that's it.
It seems to me that Israel is playing 3rd Generation warfare in a 4th Generation (asymetric) world.  The gameplan appears to go deep into south Lebanon, and to engage Hezbollah on the way out, taking out as many of them as possible, while airstrikes go after the rockets.  Any territory that they hold on to either becomes Israels or bargaining chips at the eventual resolution.  This of course, is political, not strategic or tactical.  Also, it's interesting that in this case, the most direct effect of these attacks, other than the taking of life and the destruction of infrastructure, seems to be the effect that
Israel playing their hand was NOT a good idea.  The IDF has always enjoyed a reputation as a thoroughly competent force.  History is full of their victories.  But what history also tells us is that they haven't fought a 3rd Gen war in quite awhile, and most of the matchups have been against poorly trained and armed Palestinians.  The blowback and losses against a "professional" guerilla force are much higher than I would have thought.  We're talking about ~30,000 IDF versus 6,000 Hezbollah being almost a fair fight on the ground.  That's insane.  Furthermore, this clearly communicates that the IDFof lore isn't the IDF of now – plus there is no ability for sustained operations – no remote bases, no air-to-air refueling, etc.)  This may cause other nations to recalculate their odds and make total war more likely.  But we also need better tactics to hedge against 4th Gen warfare and terrorists, and that solution won't come from the battleground.
There's also been some discussion, in particular by Sy Hersh in the New Yorker (he's really good, BTW) has written that Israel-versus-Hezbollebanon is a test case for tactics to be used against Iran.  Israel non-victory may also mean that nukes may be back on the table (regarding Iran).
I have no faith that the cease fire will do anything purposefull, as it gives Israel substantial wiggle room to semantically call an offensive action a defensive action.  For example, continuing to target bridges, because rockets could be transported them is an overt offensive act, but since those missles that could be transported of the bridge could be used to shoot at Israel, destroying the mechanism that could enable them becomes defensive.  In short, the UN declaration is worth less than whatever it's printed on. (more from Billmon).

  • Meta

  • Pages

  • Statcounter


    View My Stats