Posts Tagged: George W. Bush


4
Jan 10

Education Policy Disagreements in My Household

My wife – a special education school teacher – and I have a bit of a policy disagreement regarding teacher merit pay.

Most can agree that our Education System is broken (see anything by John Taylor Gatto) and some sort of reform is necessary (even if it rankles some of the President’s core constituents).  Sometimes that change can only be motivated through monetary incentives.  On the macro-level, I can see the potential benefits.  On the micro-level, it’s likely that her students may not ever achieve sufficiently for her to earn said bonuses.


21
Aug 09

Why do politicians only speak the truth when they’re pimping a book?

Tom Ridge finally states the obvious – the Bush White House monkeyed with Terror Alerts to boost the President’s Approval Ratings:

Among the headlines promoted by publisher Thomas Dunne Books: Ridge was never invited to sit in on National Security Council meetings; was “blindsided” by the FBI in morning Oval Office meetings because the agency withheld critical information from him; found his urgings to block Michael Brown from being named head of the emergency agency blamed for the Hurricane Katrina disaster ignored; and was pushed to raise the security alert on the eve of President Bush’s re-election, something he saw as politically motivated and worth resigning over.


6
Feb 09

Destroying the Village

There’s a quote from an unattributed USAF Major at Ben Tre (detailed in personal detail here) describing the logic of destroying an entire village while attempting to rout a deeply embedded Vietcong:

“[It] became necessary to destroy the town to save it[.]“

I don’t disagree with the premise. There is always collateral damage in war. It is always brutal, regrettable, and unavoidable. Sometimes, it is necessary to destroy the old so that the new may prosper. Sherman practiced “scorched earth” on his March to the Sea, and Schumpter theorized about creative destruction. Death and rebirth is the natural order of the world.

So it should be with “The Village”.

For those unaccustomed to the phrase, “the Village” is a theme in lefty blog circles explaining the culture and customs of DC beltway types – be they socialites, politicians, fund raisers, but especially the media – print and TV personalities especially.

From the Seminal:

These phrases are shorthand for the idea that there exists a permanent class in Washington D.C. of people “who have a proprietary interest in Washington and identify with it”. This set overlaps with, but is slightly different than, the set of government employees; the latter ostensibly serve at the pleasure of the people who elected them (or elected the person who appointed them), while the former are unabashedly self-interested (”Certainly the Washington insiders have their own interests at heart. Whenever a new president comes to town, he [or she] will be courted assiduously by those whose livelihoods depend on access to power.”). The seminal article on the Village was written in the Washington Post by Villager Sally Quinn in 1998, during the Clinton impeachment. It’s where I got those quotes above, and it’s where the term ‘Village’ comes from, and it’s full of other descriptive lines. For example:

“This is our town,” says Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, the first Democrat to forcefully condemn the president’s behavior. “We spend our lives involved in talking about, dealing with, working in government.”

…Muffie Cabot, who as Muffie Brandon served as social secretary to President and Nancy Reagan, regards the scene with despair. “This is a demoralized little village”

…”We have our own set of village rules,” says David Gergen, editor at large at U.S. News & World Report.

…”[Bill Clinton] came in here and he trashed the place,” says Washington Post columnist David Broder, “and it’s not his place.”

…Presidential historian Michael Beschloss … “When everything is turned upside down it affects our psyche more than someone who might be farming in Wyoming.”

That’s one big aspect of the Establishment mentality – the idea of entitlement, that being part of this rarefied group gives their opinions and feelings more weight than “someone who might be farming in Wyoming”. The other, equally important, part is that the Establishment is out of touch with the rest of the country.

I could easily tally their list of failings – the Clinton Impeachment, WMDs, the Iraq War, and now the economy – and particularly how out of touch they are with what Americans really think. We’re beginning to see it again with all the talks of tax cuts, spending freezes, the size of the stimulus, and a host of other issues. But that’s not the purpose of this post.

No. It’s about the public scolding of Michael Phelps for doing something the majority of Americans have done, with many doing so regularly, and ruining a young man’s life.


5
Jan 09

Compare and Contrast [Nixon v. Cheney]

From the Nixon-Frost Interview (via Throwing Things):

Frost: Are you really saying the President can do something illegal?
Nixon: I’m saying that when the President does it, that means it’s not illegal!
Frost: …I’m sorry?

From a recent interview with Dick Cheney (via Raw Story, emphasis mine):

SCHIEFFER: Do you believe that the president in time of war, that anything he does is legal?

CHENEY: I can’t say that anything he does is legal. I think we do and we have historic precedent of taking action that you wouldn’t take in peacetime but that you will take sometimes in war time in order to do the basic job that you sign up to when you take the oath of office which is to support and defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. If you hark back in our history you can look at Abraham Lincoln who suspended the writ of habeas corpus in the middle of the Civil War.

SCHIEFFER: But nobody thinks that was legal.

CHENEY: Well, no. It certainly was in the sense he wasn’t impeached.

Quite the precedent, huh?


15
Jun 08

Meme-Debunking: John McCain is different than George W. Bush

One of the prevalent memes circulating regarding John Sidney McCain is that he is his own man, and not like George W. Bush (note, the statistic is that he supports him via Congressional votes 95% of the time). Small problem like that – they are nearly identical, as John Cusack (IMDB) points out in this MoveOn advertisement.

YouTube Direktvideo link

Also curious is how some Bush dead-enders (and McCain supporters) actually maintain McCain will carry on the failed Bush policies, which directly contradicts with the image the kindler, gentler, more moderate candidate McCain desparately needs to project in order to woo independents and hoodwink Bush-Democrats.


8
Mar 08

Daily Links


24
Feb 08

If Inflation Demands a New Denomination of US Currency…

…like a $40 or $200 dollar bill, it better have George W. Bush on it.  And they better not be planning on naming an aircraft carrier after him.  Side note:  Gawd, is the new fiver UGLY.


9
Feb 08

Paying it Forward: Robbing 2009 to Bail Out 2008

Back in the car business, you were only as good as your last sales month. “I don’t care that you sold twenty cars last month, what have you done lately?”

Since automobile sales people are typically motivated by both a percentage of gross profit and unit-driven pay plans, there’s a lot of temptation to ‘rob Peter to pay Paul’.  If the sales person, finance manager, or sales manager can somehow extend a month (example, the month ends of a Friday, but you count sales on that next Saturday as being for the previous month) it could be possible to meet your bonus levels.  Harmless little bit of creative accounting, right?  Well, no.


9
Jan 08

Thought on McCain, Going into South Carolina

There's a VERY legitimate argument that both Romney, Giuliani, as well as the Democrats, if they are smart, should be having with regards to McCain…

He's already hinted that he's likely to be a one-termer.  At the risk of practicing ageism or age discrimination, he's quite old.  His captivity as a POW has certainly had a physical effect on him (particularly melanoma), and if the claims of George W. Bush circa 2000 (8-years ago) are true, his mental health. 


30
Nov 07

Presidential Daily Briefs are Based on News Coverage, Frequently Informed by Leaks from the Executive Branch

Presidents are incredibly tight-lipped about the contents of their PDBs, or Presidential Daily Briefings.  Very few of them have ever seen the light of day via FOIA request and subsequent declassification, with very few exceptions.  The most recent and notorious example was that of President Bush's August 6, 2001 PDB, pre-9/11, which was titled "Bin Laden determined to strike US", detailing various avenues and methods of attack.  In Scooter Libby's obstruction case, the defense attempted to gain access to PDB-related documents, hoping to use a greymail defense – one that was only partially effective .

The Nixon library just released a bundle of documents, as reported by the Federation of American Scientists at the Secrecy News blog , including some that shed insight on the PDB process, specifically indicating that PDB's are often contain 'intelligence' from newspapers and other journalistic resources. 

As for the selection process that determines what to include in the PDB, Mr. Marshall wrote in his Top Secret Codeword report, "It is derived… to a large extent, I believe, from a sense of what's timely as judged from the New York Times, press, and wire service coverage."

This is particularly troubling, given allegations of partisanship and declining journalistic standards, and especially as there are no safeguards in place to prevent a bad-actor from planting a story to advance the agenda of a group, nation, corporation, or individual.  Who can tell if the same processes are in place today?  We've heard that 'chatter' from blogs has even made it to the PDBs.  And it's not as though this administration has ever indicated that they wouldn't just pay for the news they want.

As a hypothetical, Dick Cheney was the firewall to George W. Bush in the lead-up to the Iraq war.  The neocons are well connected through the press and various think tanks – for example, Judith Miller stenography towards advancing their goals.  When biased reporting, originating from neocon corners and con-men, get laundered in the newspapers, and then get legitimized as actionable intelligence by our government, the consequences are much more dear than journalistic integrity. 

  • Meta

  • Pages

  • Statcounter


    View My Stats