Posts Tagged: Central Intelligence Agency


30
May 08

Fat, Drunk, and Stupid is no way to go through life, Son.

I have a hard time defending former Bush press secretary Scotty ‘Flounder’ McClellan, especially given his prior performances:

YouTube Direktvideo link

That said, he appears to be the latest of the loyal Bushies troubled by their consciences after leaving the administration.  So far, the book has delivered observations on wartime propaganda, an apology to Richard Clarke, the revelation Bush outed CIA-operative Valerie Plame via Scooter Libby, the non-suprise that the Administration has allies within FOXNEWS, that Bush similarly declassified National Secrets to advance a political agenda, warnings to be serious and skeptical regarding administration claims on Iran, and (of course) that propaganda and a media operating somewhere between lazy, incompetent, and compliant directly enabled the invasion and occupation of Iraq.


23
May 08

Insight as to McCain’s ‘character’.

Cryptome has scanned images and transcriptions from various sources referring to John McCain from the CIA’s reading room. It really tells an interesting tale, one that may not be about John McCain the Presidential candidate or Senator, but rather John McCain, the hopes of what could have been and his own vision of what he was.

On why he flew 50 times more hours to qualify as a jet fighter pilot:

McCain: When I finished [the US and Spanish Naval Academies] I had two choices: to be naval officer or a pilot…I chose to be pilot. I had to study another year and a half and I graduated in 1958. I trained intensively. I flew many hours in training to become a jet pilot.”


9
Apr 08

Justice Perverted

Well, in particular, this Mukasey claim is remarkable (fast-forward to 1:21):

YouTube Preview Image

Mukasey blubbers about how a missed phone call from a 9/11 Hijacker, if intercepted, could have stopped 9/11. Hamilton refutes this by essentially saying this is important, yet was not shared with the 9/11 Commission, implying one of three things:

  1. Mukasey was making it up for dramatic appeal.
  2. He was repeating something heard elsewhere, believing it to be true.
  3. Somehow, something quite important was suppressed from the 9/11 Commision.

22
Mar 08

Daily Links


7
Mar 08

Daily Links


29
Feb 08

Daily Links


30
Jan 08

Daily Links


11
Oct 07

Daily Links


20
Sep 07

Mo’ Freedom, Mo’ Problems

I got a heads up from Jarice Hanson (participant bio page), a chairperson at Temple University's (my alma mater, BTW) School of Communication and Theater regarding a webconference at WHYY titled Digital Democracy and Freedom of Speech.

The event looks quite interesting, and it is scheduled at a most-convenient time, 1-2:30pm on Tuesday, 10/9/2007, at the WHYY building, especially for those in the Center City (Philadelphia) area. 

To quickly riff on the subject, I understand and expect this conference to have a very US-centric focus, but I suspect conversations regarding digital freedom, at least as we Americans understand Freedom of Speech as enumerated in the First Ammendment (or don't, as the case may be), will most likely affect other nations, such as those in the Middle East and China, where excessive blocking and monitoring, often aided and abetted by prominent US companies such as Yahoo are the norm.

The excessive use of national security exemptions in FOIA, the circumvention of records-keeping and civil liberty safeguards, and others are all blatant attempts to stymie freedom of the press, but what of freedom of speech?  Despite isolated (although far too many) examples of abuses, such as the recent tasing at a John Kerry speech, "Free Speech Zones" at political gatherings, and arrests and detainings based on what t-shirt one wears, I see little formalized institutional censorship, although we're getting there.

That said, there are tremendous threats to digital freedom here in the US, but they often don't come from the government directly to the individual speaker.  No, they come indirectly, via the corporate sphere, the establishment press, intra-governmental agency suppression , other opinion influencers, ideological bullies, our society-at-large, and our own tendencies to self-censor.  In most cases, all it takes is the threat of a libel suit or a DMCA takedown letter to pull content, either by the creator or their ISP.  As illustrated in the Electronic Frontier Foundation Legal Guide, many of the concerns of online speech have little to do with the government.  You can't really say whatever you want.


5
Sep 07

Daily Links

  • Meta

  • Pages

  • Statcounter


    View My Stats