Posts Tagged: Bill Clinton


23
Sep 09

Grand Unifying Conspiracy Theory

It appears that the entirety of the blogosphere  is staying away from Sibel Edmonds explosive interview in Pat Buchanan’s American Conservative, of all places.   This is certainly understandable, given the treasonous accusations she has made.   From the article, via MeFi:

Sibel Edmonds has a story to tell. She went to work as a Turkish and Farsi translator for the FBI five days after 9/11. Part of her job was to translate and transcribe recordings of conversations between suspected Turkish intelligence agents and their American contacts. She was fired from the FBI in April 2002 after she raised concerns that one of the translators in her section was a member of a Turkish organization that was under investigation for bribing senior government officials and members of Congress, drug trafficking, illegal weapons sales, money laundering, and nuclear proliferation. She appealed her termination, but was more alarmed that no effort was being made to address the corruption that she had been monitoring.


3
Aug 09

Why so socialist?

obama-joker-poster

Make no mistake – the well-executed astroturfed healthcare protests, the ‘Kenyan birth certificate’, and the Obama-as-Joker posters are well-planned and well-financed propaganda pieces.

This is why Democrats continually lose – they’ve never learned from the tactics employed against Clinton health care push, and will continue to suffer defeat after defeat.


6
Feb 09

Destroying the Village

There’s a quote from an unattributed USAF Major at Ben Tre (detailed in personal detail here) describing the logic of destroying an entire village while attempting to rout a deeply embedded Vietcong:

“[It] became necessary to destroy the town to save it[.]“

I don’t disagree with the premise. There is always collateral damage in war. It is always brutal, regrettable, and unavoidable. Sometimes, it is necessary to destroy the old so that the new may prosper. Sherman practiced “scorched earth” on his March to the Sea, and Schumpter theorized about creative destruction. Death and rebirth is the natural order of the world.

So it should be with “The Village”.

For those unaccustomed to the phrase, “the Village” is a theme in lefty blog circles explaining the culture and customs of DC beltway types – be they socialites, politicians, fund raisers, but especially the media – print and TV personalities especially.

From the Seminal:

These phrases are shorthand for the idea that there exists a permanent class in Washington D.C. of people “who have a proprietary interest in Washington and identify with it”. This set overlaps with, but is slightly different than, the set of government employees; the latter ostensibly serve at the pleasure of the people who elected them (or elected the person who appointed them), while the former are unabashedly self-interested (”Certainly the Washington insiders have their own interests at heart. Whenever a new president comes to town, he [or she] will be courted assiduously by those whose livelihoods depend on access to power.”). The seminal article on the Village was written in the Washington Post by Villager Sally Quinn in 1998, during the Clinton impeachment. It’s where I got those quotes above, and it’s where the term ‘Village’ comes from, and it’s full of other descriptive lines. For example:

“This is our town,” says Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, the first Democrat to forcefully condemn the president’s behavior. “We spend our lives involved in talking about, dealing with, working in government.”

…Muffie Cabot, who as Muffie Brandon served as social secretary to President and Nancy Reagan, regards the scene with despair. “This is a demoralized little village”

…”We have our own set of village rules,” says David Gergen, editor at large at U.S. News & World Report.

…”[Bill Clinton] came in here and he trashed the place,” says Washington Post columnist David Broder, “and it’s not his place.”

…Presidential historian Michael Beschloss … “When everything is turned upside down it affects our psyche more than someone who might be farming in Wyoming.”

That’s one big aspect of the Establishment mentality – the idea of entitlement, that being part of this rarefied group gives their opinions and feelings more weight than “someone who might be farming in Wyoming”. The other, equally important, part is that the Establishment is out of touch with the rest of the country.

I could easily tally their list of failings – the Clinton Impeachment, WMDs, the Iraq War, and now the economy – and particularly how out of touch they are with what Americans really think. We’re beginning to see it again with all the talks of tax cuts, spending freezes, the size of the stimulus, and a host of other issues. But that’s not the purpose of this post.

No. It’s about the public scolding of Michael Phelps for doing something the majority of Americans have done, with many doing so regularly, and ruining a young man’s life.


29
Aug 08

Daily Links for August 28th


19
Aug 08

Daily Links for August 17th through August 19th

  • Twelve Ways to Sell Social Media to Your Boss – You probably already get social media, and see its value, and think it’s really nifty cool. But if you can’t articulate the benefits and the return on the effort, and several other little details to the folks upstairs, it’s going to be hard to get your ideas moved from “wouldn’t this be great?” to “let’s assign a project manager and get started.” First and foremost, you have to jump over the fence from where you’re thinking, and get into their mindset.

28
Apr 08

Newest Faux Outrage: Rebates and Tax Freeloaders

In light of the first of the stimulus checks being deposited into Americans accounts, it is high time we discussed the previous old next new conservative outrageFreeloaders!

Our friends on the right have quietly been condemning the freeloaders who will be receiving stimulus rebates, despite having paid no income tax, previously referred as Lucky Ducks in the Wall Street Journal (note how Awesome it is to be making $12k annually and paying no Federal Income Tax).

The Tax Foundation describes it thusly:


16
Apr 08

Daily Links


2
Jan 08

Malaise?

Michael Barone said the following as posted in an article on Real Clear Politics:

Second, the preference for smaller rather than larger government is not as ample as it used to be. The strongest case against big government has been its failures in the 1970s, typified by gas lines and stagflation. But the median-age voter in 2008 was born around 1964, so he or she never sat in those gas lines or struggled to pay rising bills with a paycheck eroded by inflation. That demographic factor helps explain why Democrats today are promising big-government programs, unlike Bill Clinton in 1992, when the median-age voter remembered the 1970s very well.

  • Meta

  • Pages

  • Statcounter


    View My Stats