Memes
10
Aug 07
Stu Bykofsky is RIGHT. But free speech does have consequences in the marketplace?
AND he should be fired for this nonsense :
America's fabric is pulling apart like a cheap sweater.
What would sew us back together?
Another 9/11 attack.
[...]
Is there any doubt they are planning to hit us again?
If it is to be, then let it be. It will take another attack on the homeland to quell the chattering of chipmunks and to restore America's righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail.
The unity brought by such an attack sadly won't last forever.
The first 9/11 proved that. *
E-mail stubyko@phillynews.com or call 215-854-5977. For recent columns:
This last 6-years has been a slow-motion train wreck. OBL is still on the loose. The Anthrax attackers are still on the loose. We're stuck in a quagmire in a war of choice in Iraq, losing a winnable war in Afghanistan, and then contemplating opening a third front of the Great War on Terror in Iran (and Pakistan).
I'm tired of staring into the abyss. In addition to the 3000 lives lost on 9/11 and the near 5000 (3600 military deaths, and an estimated 1000 contractor deaths) in Iraq and Afghanistan, we can chalk up threats to free speech, habeas corpus, our own privacy, and any semblance for advocacy for the middle class in Washington. We are distracted from true threats like class inequality, our aging infrastructure, precarious financial environment, and global warming with bright and shiny objects like Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan, and divisive social wedge issues like abortion, gay marriage, and evolution.
Although Bykofsky takes the easy way out and (correctly) states that another 9/11 would finally unite us, he's correct, but I hope he's thinking of the wrong outcome. He thinks that another 9/11 would would cause us to put aside our partisan differences to get "it" done – I'm assuming by "it" he means the War on Islamofacism. But there's danger in these thoughts. With the right proudly proclaiming that we are safer BECAUSE there have been no new attacks, another 9/11 might have the complete opposite consequences – reinforces the disgust and despair many of us are feeling towards our media and political institutions.
The next-9/11 will preceed one of two outcomes – either the police state, or the beginning of the American Renaissance, where we cast of the dead weight and corrupt institutions of the past and become the America we thought, hoped, and dreamed we were.
Should Bykofsky get fired? Should free speech have consequences? Vote here.
29
Jun 07
iPhone madness.
No matter what else is going on in the world today, one item is virtually guaranteed to be driving a full 1% of internet traffic today…
The debut of the iPhone.
It's beautiful, and I love the interface, but I'm not spending $500 for a phone – I prefer my trusty Nokia 3650 and Dell Axim x50v, thankyouverymuch. Besides, I've always thought that the long neglected Pocket PC platform, with a sexier interface, would be a more-than-capable competitor. Hopefully this will encourage developers, manufacturers, and carriers to get serious about the handset experience. Not only that, but the availability for an "open" phone that allows for outside development (with apps running on the internet via webapp, not "on the phone", a la Facebook's F8, will allow a diverse (and passionate) user base to compensate for any of the iPhone's real or perceived weaknesses.
While personally I'm a big fan of convergence devices, I'll take a wait-and-see for the second generation as far as the iPhone is concerned.
30
Mar 07
What are the odds of getting this from FOIA?
A long time ago, probably as the domestic spying-slash-internet-tapping scandal was breaking, I posted the following search – thinking about what I'd like to see – the Government submitting to the same oversight as us jus' folks. Imagine if we could see what the Executive Branch was Googling?

I've long maintained that watching your server logs (incoming, that is) is a great idea. I've often gotten insight into stories and found out things that I might have not found out through other means. For example, why was the CIA looking for "No Fly List Spreadsheet xls" (story here), or what is OSIS? And who is looking for Matt O'Donnell nude (he's a local ABC affiliate news anchor)? Why were people from the Republican National Committee, such as "Shawn Reinschmiedt", Googling staff members regarding the "caging list"? Why was someone from the Pentagon looking for a WaPo story on corrupted-company MZM, connected to the most corrupt Congressman in US history? Hell, I even had someone ON THE FLOOR OF THE US Senate looking for "Joe Lieberman" (hint, he's standing over there, with the Republicans).
While there has long been a long historical precedent of wrangling over internal emails, from Reagan and Iran-Contra through Clinton to the current day, the webserver logs are far more interesting. What delicious treasure-troves await us in the White House webserver logs?


