Civil Rights


9
Apr 08

Justice Perverted

Well, in particular, this Mukasey claim is remarkable (fast-forward to 1:21):

YouTube Preview Image

Mukasey blubbers about how a missed phone call from a 9/11 Hijacker, if intercepted, could have stopped 9/11. Hamilton refutes this by essentially saying this is important, yet was not shared with the 9/11 Commission, implying one of three things:

  1. Mukasey was making it up for dramatic appeal.
  2. He was repeating something heard elsewhere, believing it to be true.
  3. Somehow, something quite important was suppressed from the 9/11 Commision.

15
Dec 07

Only one reasonable explanation left…They Knew!!1!

Nancy Pelosi takes impeachment off the table. We find that Democratic Leadership was aware of the waterboarding tapes. Most recently, Harry Reid appears to be dismissing Chris Dodd’s hold (a member of his own party, no less) on legislation which promises retroactive telecom immunity as related to domestic spying.

I had always assumed that BushCo distorted, lied, or just never disclosed to the opposition the shenanigans they were up to, which would be wholly consistent with their actions in the past.

I can understand being bought by lobbyist dollars. I can even rationalize (but not condone) allowing things to spillover into 2008. But why facillitate and condone their actions further?


8
Nov 07

Immunity for Telecoms over Domestic Spying?

Among the general population, there seems to be no question over immunity for the telecoms.  Either the public is unaware of the scope of the story or they believe – erroneously – that any domestic spying undertaken has actually kept us safer and not diminished our rights, or even inconvenienced us.

Knowledgeable readers have been following this since the Mark Klein, an AT&T whistleblower, broke the story broke nearly two years ago.  To briefly surmise, the ENTIRE internet passes through the NSA.  They grab huge chunks of it – your emails, Amazon purchases, credit card transaction, web browsing, instant messages, Facebook stalking – and then winnow it down to find what they are looking for.  The presumption is that everyone could be guilty, and that we don't need probable cause to monitor communications and go on fishing expeditions.

NSA Octopus from NSAWatch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even worse still, much of that actionable intelligence is no longer processed and disseminated by Federal employees, who behavior is governed by law, legislation, and the threat of losing a well-paying government job, but rather outsourced to private industry, outside of Congressional oversite. 

The President's call for immunity hints at the 'alleged' law breaking that industry 'might' have done in 'cooperating' with law enforcement, promising to veto legislation that does not tender complete retroactive immunity to the industry, all the way back to September 11th, 2001 (Which is interesting, since they started their efforts on 2/27/2007).  He uses "complicated language" as reported by Crooks and Liars:

“When Congress returns in September the Intelligence committees and leaders in both parties will need to complete work on the comprehensive reforms requested by Director McConnell, including the important issue of providing meaningful liability protection to those who are alleged to have assisted our Nation following the attacks of September 11, 2001[.]” 

It's very difficult to wrap your head around the technology and legal concepts surrounding the issue.  Fortunately, Senator Chris Dodd, the first Presidential candidate willing to go to the mat over telecomm immunity, has posted this short video with Klein breaking down the issue [via EFF]:

YouTube Preview Image

Klein seems to think that the attempt for immunity is nothing more than a coverup..


10
Aug 07

Stu Bykofsky is RIGHT. But free speech does have consequences in the marketplace?

AND he should be fired for this nonsense :

America's fabric is pulling apart like a cheap sweater.

What would sew us back together?

Another 9/11 attack.

[...]

Is there any doubt they are planning to hit us again?

If it is to be, then let it be. It will take another attack on the homeland to quell the chattering of chipmunks and to restore America's righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail.

The unity brought by such an attack sadly won't last forever.

The first 9/11 proved that. *

E-mail stubyko@phillynews.com or call 215-854-5977. For recent columns:

http://go.philly.com/byko.

This last 6-years has been a slow-motion train wreck.  OBL is still on the loose.  The Anthrax attackers are still on the loose.  We're stuck in a quagmire in a war of choice in Iraq, losing a winnable war in Afghanistan, and then contemplating opening a third front of the Great War on Terror in Iran (and Pakistan).

I'm tired of staring into the abyss.  In addition to the 3000 lives lost on 9/11 and the near 5000 (3600 military deaths, and an estimated 1000 contractor deaths) in Iraq and Afghanistan, we can chalk up threats to free speech, habeas corpus, our own privacy, and any semblance for advocacy for the middle class in Washington.  We are distracted from true threats like class inequality, our aging infrastructure, precarious financial environment, and global warming with bright and shiny objects like Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan, and divisive social wedge issues like abortion, gay marriage, and evolution.

Although Bykofsky takes the easy way out and (correctly) states that another 9/11 would finally unite us, he's correct, but I hope he's thinking of the wrong outcome.  He thinks that another 9/11 would would cause us to put aside our partisan differences to get "it" done – I'm assuming by "it" he means the War on Islamofacism.  But there's danger in these thoughts.  With the right proudly proclaiming that we are safer BECAUSE there have been no new attacks, another 9/11 might have the complete opposite consequences – reinforces the disgust and despair many of us are feeling towards our media and political institutions.

The next-9/11 will preceed one of two outcomes – either the police state, or the beginning of the American Renaissance, where we cast of the dead weight and corrupt institutions of the past and become the America we thought, hoped, and dreamed we were.

Should Bykofsky get fired?  Should free speech have consequences?  Vote here


29
Jul 07

“I knew it was you Fredo…”

"…I knew it was you all along."

YouTube Preview Image

NYTimes call for the Impeachment of Alberto Gonzalez.  Finally.

It confirmed what most people long ago concluded: that Mr. Gonzales is more concerned about doing political-damage control for Mr. Bush — in this case insisting that there was never a Justice Department objection to a clearly illegal program — than in doing his duty. But the White House continued to defend him.

As far as we can tell, there are three possible explanations for Mr. Gonzales’s talk about a dispute over other — unspecified — intelligence activities. One, he lied to Congress. Two, he used a bureaucratic dodge to mislead lawmakers and the public: the spying program was modified after Mr. Ashcroft refused to endorse it, which made it “different” from the one Mr. Bush has acknowledged. The third is that there was more wiretapping than has been disclosed, perhaps even purely domestic wiretapping, and Mr. Gonzales is helping Mr. Bush cover it up.

Democratic lawmakers are asking for a special prosecutor to look into Mr. Gonzales’s words and deeds. Solicitor General Paul Clement has a last chance to show that the Justice Department is still minimally functional by fulfilling that request.

If that does not happen, Congress should impeach Mr. Gonzales.

Ironically enough, Bush's nickname for Abu Gonzalez is "Fredo".

YouTube Preview Image


18
Jun 07

The Inconvenient Truths of Immigration.

I'm ashamed to say this, but bleeding heart liberal that I am, I have no real minority friends.  No people of color were at my wedding.  I don't share any hobbies or interests with people from other lands.  So I can't fall back on my legion of brown, red, and yellow allies.  I do have plenty of coworkers, classmates, employees, and acquaintances, but no real friends to speak of.

But that doesn't mean I'm unqualified to comment on the issue.


9
May 07

Block Real-ID.

The EFF has a form .


17
Nov 06

WTF, America? [Updates at bottom]

By this point, you may or may not have heard that a student at UCLA got tazered by campus police for refusing to "show his papers" while at the library.  Similarly disgusting, one of the officers, when asked by an observer for his badge number and name, threatened to tazer and arrest the student questioning them (which is audible during the video, as well) and most certainly not legal.  The embedded video is most likely not appropriate for small children, the workplace, or anywhere else, for that matter.

YouTube Preview Image 

The account of the incident by University officials is that the student was asked to leave, he refused, resisted, and then was tasered.  The LA Times' references the police report:

According to a campus police report, the incident began when community service officers, who serve as guards at the library, began their nightly routine of checking to make sure everyone using the library after 11 p.m. is a student or otherwise authorized to be there.

[...]

Campus officials said the long-standing policy was adopted to ensure students' safety.

When Tabatabainejad, 23, refused to provide his ID to the community service officer, the officer told him he would have to show it or leave the library, the report said.

After repeated requests, the officer left and returned with campus police, who asked Tabatabainejad to leave "multiple times," according to a statement by the UCLA Police Department.

"He continued to refuse," the statement said. "As the officers attempted to escort him out, he went limp and continued to refuse to cooperate with officers or leave the building."

Witnesses disputed that account, saying that when campus police arrived, Tabatabainejad had begun to walk toward the door with his backpack. When an officer approached him and grabbed his arm, the witnesses said, Tabatabainejad told the officer to let go, yelling "Get off me" several times.

"Tabatabainejad encouraged library patrons to join his resistance," police said. "The officers deemed it necessary to use the Taser."

Officers stunned Tabatabainejad, causing him to fall to the floor.

The video shows Tabatabainejad yelling, "Here's your Patriot Act, here's your … abuse of power," the Daily Bruin reported, adding he used a profanity.

The Daily Bruin's account was somewhat different

The CSOs left, returning minutes later, and police officers arrived to escort the student out. By this time the student had begun to walk toward the door with his backpack when an officer approached him and grabbed his arm, at which point the student told the officer to let him go. A second officer then approached the student as well.

The student began to yell "get off me," repeating himself several times.

It was at this point that the officers shot the student with a Taser for the first time, causing him to fall to the floor and cry out in pain. The student also told the officers he had a medical condition…


Laila Gordy, a fourth-year economics student who was present in the library during the incident, said police officers threatened to shoot her with a Taser when she asked an officer for his name and his badge number. 

In the "good 'ol days", when authority had absolute power, the word of the University administrators and campus police would have been enough.  Any video from the library's CCD cameras would be "lost", "degradable", or had "no relavent information".  A committee would have been formed, a report made, and perhaps some sensitivity training for police officers.  But now that there is the very real possibility that "we are all big brother", will it serve as a check and balance towards the abuse of authority, or will it allow those with fascists authoritarian daydreams to assert the need for even more consolidated power and authority?

The Daily Bruin has a follow-up here… 

Last thought for now – it's only a matter of time until we hear people saying that people shouldn't be allowed to photograph or video law enforcement officers, because it can impede their actions and judgement, and they may not act to protect the public good out of fear of punishment for "how something looks".

Updated:  That didn't take long.  Via Daily Bruin columnist David Lazar:

In my opinion, he was asking for it.

When Mostafa Tabatabainejad refused to present his BruinCard in Powell Library when asked during a routine check by Community Service Officers, scoffing at them and police, it created an uproar, the fallout of which has graced airwaves and prompted headlines internationally.

Whether or not the police used excessive force, there is no doubt that the student showed a blatant disregard for UCLA's regulations and police authority.

[...]

Many question the use of any force in this situation, but force is not without its purposes. To keep the rest of us safe, officers expose themselves to the constant threat of violence, and some officers see their colleagues killed in the line of duty.

Updated: Statement from UCLA: "Compliance is critical for the safety and well-being of everyone."


19
Mar 06

Delaware County, PA, and the connection to Nixon Era Spying

And yet again, the Delaware County Times is fast asleep. Your so-called liberal media, hard at work. Via the LA Times:

THIRTY-FIVE YEARS ago today, a group of anonymous activists broke into the small, two-man office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Media, Pa., and stole more than 1,000 FBI documents that revealed years of systematic wiretapping, infiltration and media manipulation designed to suppress dissent.

[...]

 

Nevertheless, the [Washington] Post broke the first story on March 24, 1971, after receiving an envelope with 14 FBI documents detailing how the bureau had enlisted a local police chief, letter carriers and a switchboard operator at Swarthmore College to spy on campus and black activist groups in the Philadelphia area.

  • Meta

  • Pages

  • Statcounter


    View My Stats