-
-
-
Despite the popularity of the rule, few people seem to understand it. [...] Some of these errors are due to not understanding what the rule means. Others are just my opinion of unfair attacks on an otherwise useful principle.
-
Poor Apple. The more successful it becomes, the more it finds itself in harm’s way. A sort of “more money, more problems” conundrum.
-
This unborn baby ornament has prompted us to do a round-up of wacky Christmas tree ornaments. What’s Christmas without celebrating the unborn fetus? We’ll bet that Jesus’ Christmas tree is totally decked out with these.
-
Smirky and the like are vultures, re-victimizing Maureen Faulkner, and are certainly no better than the French, the mothball-smelling paper-machied activists, and anti-death penalty crew. No wonder she wants Mumia dead – that the only closure she’ll get.
-
Mitt should have come clean – the fact that he fails to mentions the the founding story of mormonism indicates some anxiety on it, which his (GOP) rivals will use as a claw-hammer on the Evangelicals. Can Mitt recover?
-
Just as DRM tries to restrict the spread of content, a noncompete seeks to restrict the spread of a human’s ideas for a particular industry within the labor arena.
-
Managers want a barometer of performance, a hammer to use on their subordinates, and a straightforward quantification of their business. [Here] are a few of the guidelines we use when we take on this task
